The banner in the Denver airport welcomes everyone to the 2008 National Performing Arts Convention, a gathering of presenters, artists, advocacy organizations and other interested parties from across the country. I'm specifically here to take part in the annual meeting of the Music Critics Association of North America, which I haven't been able to attend for quite a few years now. Ironically, the last time I attended was the 2004 meeting in Pittsburgh, which was also the inaugural NPAC gathering. (Among the people I met there for the first time were Marc Geelhoed and Vivien Schweitzer, both of whom have been valued colleagues and good friends ever since.)
The answer to the question in my header has nothing to do with the cruddy quality of the image -- I'd just managed to exit a plane after spending four hours wedged between a reclining seat and a bulkhead, so you'll have to forgive me -- but the time on the clock under the banner: 9:20pm.
I was originally supposed to arrive at half past noon, but United Airlines canceled my morning flight. No mingling, hobknobbing or networking for me this afternoon, then, and I also missed a performance by the Colorado Symphony Orchestra. That last bit is the real disappointment: I'd been looking forward to hearing Natasha Paremski play John Corigliano's Piano Concerto, and Giya Kancheli's Styx was on the program as well.
So instead I'm sitting in my room on the 19th floor of the Comfort Inn, getting ready to do a revision on a story I filed before leaving New York this afternoon, before calling it an early night. There's going to be a lot to see and do during the next two days, so I'd better take a moment to get ready -- and to remember how to use my camera, as well.
Playlist:
Joel Harrison - The Wheel (Innova)
Donna Summer - Crayons (Burgundy)
Magma - Mekanik Destruktiw Kommandoh (Seventh)
Van der Graaf Generator - Real Time (Fie!)
Grateful Dead - Road Trips, Vol. 1, No. 2: October '77 (Grateful Dead)
What goes on at meetings of the Music Critics Association of North America?
Posted by: Corey Dargel | June 12, 2008 at 01:56 AM
The first rule of MCANA is, there is no MCANA. Wait... that's exactly what we're trying to prevent with this meeting...
Seriously, Corey, figuring out the answer to that question is exactly why I paid to be here this year.
Posted by: Steve Smith | June 12, 2008 at 03:21 AM
Good question, Corey. And hey Steve, when is the vote on whether serialism represents the only true way forward and tonality is, thereofre a nostalgic relic of the past scheduled for this year?
Posted by: Marc Geelhoed | June 12, 2008 at 11:57 AM
I meant therefore, of course.
Posted by: Marc Geelhoed | June 12, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Marc, Way to beat the serialists at their own game, proclaiming an aesthetic that often deliberately avoids the perception of "moving forward" as the only way to move forward!
Posted by: Corey Dargel | June 12, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Mssrs. Smith & Geelhoed:
Some of us (who for some reason were not invited) heard that there is/was a panel at the MCANA on the state of music blogs. Any news on how that panned out?
Mssrs. Geelhoed & Dargel:
Serialism is not the only way forward; however, this does not preclude tonality from possibly being a nostalgic relic of the past, does it? Not to say serialism is not (necessarily) yet another relic (if perhaps not so nostalgic, for some). But does that mean returning to the 19th century? If so, why?
Posted by: Sator Arepo | June 15, 2008 at 07:02 PM
Mr. Arepo,
I don't work as a critic anymore, and therefore am not a member of MCANA, so I don't know how anything went down at the NPAC.
And you are muddying the waters with your attempts at nuancing the question. This vote always goes down "Yes" or "no." An election is no time for subjective responses!!!
Posted by: Marc Geelhoed | June 16, 2008 at 04:23 PM